This looks exactly the same as a present participle, and for this reason it is now common to call both forms 'the -ing form'. Howeverit is useful to understand the difference between the two. The gerund always has the same function as a noun (although it looks like a verb), so it can be used:
a. as the subject of the sentence:
b. as the complement of the verb 'to be':
c. after prepositions. The gerund must be used when a verb comes after a preposition:
This is also true of certain expressions ending in a preposition, e.g. in spite of, there's no point in..:
d. after a number of 'phrasal verbs' which are composed of a verb + preposition/adverb
Example:
to look forward to, to give up, to be for/against, to take to, to put off, to keep on:
NOTE: There are some phrasal verbs and other expressions that include the word 'to' as a preposition, not as part of a to-infinitive: - to look forward to, to take to, to be accustomed to, to be used to. It is important to recognise that 'to' is a preposition in these cases, as it must be followed by a gerund:
It is possible to check whether 'to’ is a preposition or part of a to-infinitive: if you can put a noun or the pronoun 'it' after it, then it is a preposition and must be followed by a gerund:
e. in compound nouns
It is clear that the meaning is that of a noun, not of a continuous verb.
f. after the expressions:
can't help, can't stand, it's no use/good, and the adjective worth:
The '-ing' form of the verb may be a present participle or a gerund.
The form is identical, the difference is in the function, or the job the word does in the sentence.
This is most commonly used:
This always has the same function as a noun (although it looks like a verb), so it can be used:
The present participle of most verbs has the form base+ing and is used in the following ways:
a. as part of the continuous form of a verb
(See continuous tenses in VERB TENSES)
b. after verbs of movement/position in the pattern: verb + present participle
This construction is particularly useful with the verb 'to go', as in these common expressions :
to go shopping | to go walking |
c. after verbs of perception in the pattern:
verb + object + present participle
NOTE: There is a difference in meaning when such a sentence contains a zero-infinitiverather than a participle. The infinitive refers to a complete action, or part of an action.:
Compare:
d. as an adjective
amazing, worrying, exciting, boring
e. with the verbs spend and waste, in the pattern: verb + time/money expression + present participle
f. with the verbs catch and find, in the pattern: verb + object + present participle:
With catch, the participle always refers to an action which causes annoyance or anger:
This is not the case with find, which is unemotional:
g. to replace a sentence or part of a sentence:
When two actions occur at the same time, and are done by the same person or thing, we can use a present participle to describe one of them:
When one action follows very quickly after another done by the same person or thing, we can express the first action with a present participle:
The present participle can be used instead of a phrase starting as, since, because, and it explains the cause or reason for an action:
The past tense is sometimes used in English to refer to an 'unreal' situation. So, although the tense is the past, we are usually talking about the present, e.g. in a Type 2 conditional sentence:
If an elephant and a mouse fell in love, they would have many problems.
Although fell is in the past tense, we are talking about a hypothetical situation that might exist now or at any time, but we are not referring to the past. We call this use the unreal past.
Other situations where this occurs are:
The following expressions can be used to introduce hypothetical situations:
- supposing, if only, what if. They are followed by a past tense to indicate that the condition they introduce is unreal:
These expressions can also introduce hypothetical situations in the past and then they are followed by the past perfect.
The verb to wish is followed by an 'unreal' past tense when we want to talk about situations in the present that we are not happy about but cannot change:
NOTE: When we want to talk about situations we are not happy about and where we wantsomeone else to change them, we use to wish followed by would + infinitive:
These two expressions are also followed by an unreal past. The verb is in the past tense, but the situation is in the present.
When we want to talk about a course of action we would prefer someone else to take, we use I'd rather + past tense:
NOTE: the stress can be important in these sentences, to show what our preference is:
Similarly, when we want to say that now is a suitable moment to do something, either for ourselves or for someone else, we use it's time + past tense:
It is possible for the two parts of a conditional sentence to refer to different times, and the resulting sentence is a "mixed conditional" sentence. There are two types of mixed conditional sentence:
The tense in the 'if' clause is the past perfect, and the tense in the main clause is the present conditional:
IF' CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
If + past perfectIf I had worked harder at school | Present conditionalI would have a better job now. |
In these sentences, the time is past in the 'if' clause, and present in the main clause. They refer to an unreal past condition and its probable result in the present. They express a situation which is contrary to reality both in the past and in the present:
The tense in the If-clause is the simple past, and the tense in the main clause is the perfect conditional:
IF' CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
If + simple pastIf I wasn't afraid of spiders | Perfect conditionalI would have picked it up. |
In these sentences the time in the If-clause is now or always, and the time in the main clause is before now. They refer to an unreal present situation and its probable (but unreal) past result:
a. If she wasn't afraid of flying she wouldn't have travelled by boat.
b. I'd have been able to translate the letter if my Italian was better.
c. If I was a good cook, I'd have invited them to lunch.
d. If the elephant wasn't in love with the mouse, she'd have trodden on him by now.